StrivingLife presents ...

In 1875, in a small Italian town, the fragmentary writings of Marciello Punto, Domingo were found in a collection of lose papers in a small bookstore. While the significance of the find would not be apparent for almost 70 years later, the significance of those writings today is quite clear. Unfortunately, much of the world, especially the United States, is unaware of this great Italian poet, something which I wish to alleviate today.

While the exact birth place and time of Marciello Punto, Domingo is unknown, there have been a number of guesses. Some believe that he was born in the late 1700s, while others believe that he was born around 1825. Unfortunately, no concrete record of Marciello Punto, Domingo has ever been found, outside of a few literary pieces. In 1860, for example, there is a small allusion to Marciello Punto, Domingo in the writings of Raul Renzo.

"Throughout my life I believed that no one knew what I was going through, until my eyes alighted upon the words of Marciello Punto, words that I shall never forget 'There was madness and chaos, and the children were weeping.' From then on I knew that my task was to write."

In at least two other works this same line has been quoted, although with no reference. However, since these works are dated to be written after 1850 to 1860, the general consensus is that these writings are Marciello Punto, Domingo's.

Further evidence of Marciello existence during this period is fragmentary and questionable at best. In a local writing of the time, we see mention of a 'fiery Domingo Marciello', who wrecks havoc wherever he goes. However, because the writings come primarily from church sources, it is questionable whether or not Domingo Marciello wrecks physical or spiritual havoc, for if we are to take the fragment as a basis for all of his works, then Marciello would appear to be arguing for the absence of order.

Unfortunately, further information regarding Marciello Punto, Domingo has been lost in time, or his history consists only of the fragments here mentioned. Perhaps he is best summed up by his famous writing, "Ci era follia e caos ed i bambini stavano piangendo." (There was madness and chaos, and the children were weeping.), or perhaps by the journal of the clergyman who writes "È talmente odioso... quando è nato, Dio era in vacanza...", and elsewhere, "quando è nato, Dio non c'era, e se c'era dormiva."

While reading a past news item regarding the Young Lawyers Division of the State Bar of Wisconsin, I asked myself if donating was equal to volunteering. The Young Lawyers Division (YLD) collects business clothing from lawyers to give to lawyers who cannot afford business clothing. If lawyer X donates clothing to the YLD, is lawyer X volunteering? To get to the answer to this question, I have to proof that volunteering implies, or suggests, donating, and that donating implies volunteering. If either is not the case, or if both are not the case, then volunteering is not the same as donating.

Looking on Answers.com, we can find the following definition for volunteering, "To give or offer to give voluntarily: volunteered their services; volunteer to give blood." For donating, we have "To present as a gift to a fund or cause; contribute."

Looking at the first definition, we see "volunteer to give blood", which is also stated as "donate blood" in some American Red Cross posters. This is one case, then, where the two words can be interchanged, and do imply the other.

Yet, they are not interchanged freely. 'Volunteer to give' is swapped with 'donate', and vice versa. Could we say "Volunteer to donate blood"? It appears that we can, and that we are not repeating ourselves too much. After all, "Get paid to donate blood" is used often enough; 'donate' is here used in place of 'contribute'.

Again according to Answers.com, "To give or supply in common with others; give to a common fund or for a common purpose." Yet, it can also mean "To submit for publication: contributed two stories to the summer issue." Some people do contribute articles, and get paid for doing so. So, contributing is not completely without pay, as 'supply' in the first definition for 'contribute' suggests.

But do volunteers not get paid for volunteering? Can we think of any instances where they do get paid? Clearly, if someone volunteers to man a booth, yet is given free food, one might argue that they are getting paid. After all, in exchange for sitting at a booth, they get food that they otherwise would have had to have paid for. If we take this far enough, we could argue that the recognition volunteers get is a kind of service done for the volunteers, in exchange for them volunteering, for good publicity brings recognition to an individual, which leads to some level of trust.

We can look to Mother Teresa for another example of this. While giving her time to help others, she did it because she believed it was the thing to do to be a moral individual, according to the religion that she prescribed to, or believed in.

So it appears both volunteering and donating can be seen as things that are done not only for the act itself, but also for the things that the act will bring about (recognition, broadly). But does that mean that we can say that volunteering and donating is the same thing? Can we think of any case where the one cannot be substituted for the other?

Perhaps it's best to look at what originally brought this question up - donating clothing. Is there a difference between sitting at a booth and donating clothing? I think one could argue that there is indeed a great difference. In the first case, one offers up their time, while in the second case they only offer up a good that they may be through with. I would argue that there is a great difference between spending half an hour sitting at a booth and picking out some clothes that I no longer wear and donating them. While they both require some time on my part, as far as preparation, the former requires a constant effort of time, while the latter only requires that I perform a brief task.

Volunteering, then, suggests a greater contribution than just donating. Of course, as pointed out above, one could say that they donate their time, in which case donating would be very similar to volunteering. Yet, I think I would argue that volunteering is consistently 'greater than' donating, as far as what the former is able give to a cause.

===

Definitions from Answers.com, visited May 6 2005.